智游城

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

楼主: admin
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Phil Hellmuth专栏

  [复制链接]
321#
Phil Hellmuth 发表于 2011-4-26 01:50:32 | 只看该作者
Wynn This!

On the opening weekend of the NCAA basketball tournament I spent the weekend in Las Vegas watching games, and on Monday I played in the four daylong $5,000 buy in main event at the “Wynn Casino.”  The structure was great!  We started with $30,000 in chips and there was tons of time to move your chips.  On Day Three the following hand came up.

With the blinds at $2,500-$5,000, Dutch Boyd opened his third pot in a row in early position, making it $12,000 to go.  In middle position I looked down at K-K and I had a bad feeling.  I decided to smooth call, and the player in the big blind called as well.  The flop was 5d-3d-2s, both players checked to me, and I checked.  On the turn the seven of spades came off, and the player in the big blind fired out $19,000.  Dutch called, and I called.  The river was the jack of clubs, and the player in the big blind bet out $33,000.  Dutch and I both called, and the player in the big blind flipped up J-J to claim the pot with trip jacks!  Dutch flipped up Q-Q, and I was feeling a little sick to my stomach as I flipped up K-K!  Was I unlucky in this hand?  Yes, but…

Let’s take a closer look at this hand.  Dutch’s raise was pretty standard.  My call is OK.  I mean, ideally I would like to reraise with K-K about 70% of the time, especially if I am occasionally three betting it weak (reraising with bluffing hands).  If I am never three betting my opponents, then a three bet looks really strong, and I would argue that this is the 30% of the time that I should smooth call with K-K.  I mean why announce the strength of my hand?  The fact that Dutch opened his third pot in a row suggests some weakness, and thus it could be argued that this was a good time to smooth call with K-K.  I like the third player’s smooth call with J-J in the big blind.  First, he was out of position.  Second, if he read one or both of us for being really strong, then a smooth call was a terrific move.  To be fair, if he read us as being weak, then I would like to see him three bet it with J-J and try to win the pot right then and there.  I like the big blinds check on the flop, and Dutch’s check was OK with me as well as he was attempting to trap us and keep the pot size small (in case one of us had like Ad-Jd), although it is also a good spot to bet with Q-Q.  I mean, these days everyone expects a continuation bet (the original raiser to bet on the flop), so that a bet here in this spot would be standard and would not reveal the strength of the pocket queens.  Thus, why not make that continuation bet with your hugely strong pocket queens?  I do not like my check on the flop although the check does keep the pot size down (and it keep me in the tournament) if my opponent had say, Ad-Jd, trips, or pocket aces.  Still, there is a time to play it safe, and there is a time to go for it!  And pocket kings--on a 5d-3d-2s flop—is go time.  I should have bet something like 60% of the pot, or maybe even more.  On the turn, the player in the big blinds $19,000 bet was ok, and Dutch’s smooth call seems ok, although I would like to see Dutch raise it up to maybe, say, $75,000.  I hate my smooth call again.  The reason I smooth called here was to keep myself alive in the poker tournament--I still had $120,000 left behind after the smooth call.  A better play would have been to raise it up to $80,000 or so, or maybe just move all in.  On the river, I like the player in the big blinds $33,000 bet.  His bet sizing kept both Dutch and I in there to pay off his hand.  Had he bet a lot more, than maybe one or both of us could have folded our hands.

Unlucky?  Maybe, but this hand was set up for me to win it, had I simply played it the right way (more aggressively).  A reraise pre-flop allows me to win the pot and get rid of the player with the J-J, and maybe Dutch loses $150,000 to me.  If I bet big on the flop (5-3-2), then I could have moved all in on the turn (5-3-2-7) and I am over 80% sure that the J-J would have folded.  Alas, instead I finished 19th (22 were paid), but I am ready to win a few big tournaments right now.  I am on top of my game, strong as I can be, and I am ready and willing to win big!
322#
Phil Hellmuth 发表于 2011-4-29 08:53:24 | 只看该作者
West Coast Bust Out

After making Day Three in the Wynn Poker Classic Championship event, I wanted to play in more poker tournaments!  I played three solid days of poker at the Wynn only to finish in nineteenth place, when 22 were paid; I wasn’t happy with my finish, but at least I made the money.  So when the WSOP (World Series of Poker) and ESPN asked me to fly to Harrahs-Rincon Casino in the San Diego area the next day to interview Dale Earnhardt Jr, I took a look at the WSOP Circuit event schedule and discovered that the main event began Sunday.  So I hopped right on in!

On Day Two I found myself sitting to the left of Tim West.  West is well liked by the poker community and he had just won the Wynn Classic on Thursday, and I respect the way he plays in no limit Hold’em tournaments.  After about 20 minutes West raised it up in early position, and I reraised it with like 8-3 off suit.  West was raising a lot of pots and I sensed that he was weak; I was right, and West folded.  About 30 minutes later, West raised it up in early position, and I looked down at A-K.  With the blinds at $300-$600, and a $50 ante, West opened for $1,600.  I didn’t have a read one way or the other, so I made it $4,500 to go.  West then moved all in—West had $130,000—for my last $19,000.  I looked at West and I felt some serious strength emanating from him.  Then I asked myself, “Does Tim have pocket aces?”  I felt like he did not have pocket aces.  So now what?  A-K is a tough hand to get away from for 36 big blinds, but I did feel strength.  If West had K-K, then I was in tough shape.  But if West had Q-Q, J-J, or A-K, then a call here was warranted.  West and I had been actually talking on the phone quite a bit in the days leading up to the event, so I felt like he was playing his hand straight up, which meant that he was super strong, which meant that I should fold.  Back and forth I went between calling all in and folding before I thought, “I feel strongly that Tim doesn’t have pocket aces, so put the chips into the middle!”  I called, and West flipped up pocket kings, doh!  The cards came off K-10-7-10-J, bye bye Phil!

West had this to say about the hand, “I felt like my best play was to move all in, or to smooth call your $2,900 reraise.  I really didn’t want to reraise any other amount as I felt like you would fold your hand.”  The good news for me is that I thought that there was a great chance that West had K-K.  Next time I fly somewhere to play in a poker tournament, I really need to completely trust my instincts!  Congrats to Tim West for finishing in second place; a first at Wynn, a second in San Diego, what a week!!
323#
yoking 发表于 2011-4-29 14:37:50 | 只看该作者
321#

Wynn This!
韦恩赌场KK败比

我在洛杉矶观看了NCAA篮球锦标赛的开赛周末赛事,然后周一开始在韦恩赌场打历时四天的5000美元买入的主赛事。奖金结构棒极了!初始筹码$30000,而且有大把时间运用筹码。打到第三天,下面这手牌出现了。

盲注是$2500/$5000美元时,Dutch Boyd在前面位置连续第三手牌公开加注,他加注到$12000美元。我在中间位置上,看着手里的KK,有种不祥的预感。我做了跟注后,大盲上的玩家也做了跟注。翻牌圈5d-3d-2s,两人过牌,我也过牌。转牌是一张7s,这时大盲上的玩家下注$19000,Dutch跟,我也跟。河牌Jc,大盲上的玩家下注$33000,Dutch和我都跟注,结果大盲的玩家翻出JJ,河牌成三条赢下底池。Dutch亮出的是QQ,我亮出KK时心里真不是滋味。这手牌是我不走运吗?是的,但是…

我们来仔细分析一下这手牌。Dutch的加注是很标准的,我的跟注也还凑合。我的意思是,
在理想的情况下,特别是当我偶尔拿诈唬牌再加注,然后做弱的3BET时,我会拿KK在70%的情况下再加注。如果我从来不3BET对手,那么一次3BET会显得太强,这时我会觉得这个拿着KK在30%情况的平跟的打法更合适。我的意思是为什么要透露你的牌很强呢? 事实上Dutch连续三次公开加注说明了他的一些弱点,因此也可以说这时拿KK平跟是合适的。我很喜欢大盲上的玩家拿着对J平跟,原因在于,首先,他没有位置;其次,要是他看出我和Dutch中有一个或两个人的牌都很强,那么他的平跟好到无话可说。但是公平地说,他要是读出我们俩牌力都是偏弱,那么我觉得他应该3BET JJ,争取立马拿下底池。 我喜欢大盲在翻牌圈的过牌,Dutch的过牌我认为也可以,他企图对我们设陷阱,同时保持一个小底池,以防我和大盲有人拿着Ad-Jd,当然拿QQ在翻牌圈下注也是不错的。因为现如今,所有人都期望一次持续下注,也就是第一个加注玩家在翻牌圈下注,所以在这下注也是标准的,一般不会透露你是拿着QQ这样的强牌。所以为什么不拿很强的对Q在翻牌圈持续下注呢?但我不喜欢我在翻牌圈的过牌,虽然如果对手拿着Ad-Jd,三张或AA的话,这个过牌让我维持了一个小底池也避免了出局的惨况,但我还是不喜欢。因为有时需要我们打得保守,有时则需要我们死磕。KK面对5d-3d-2s的翻牌圈时就应该是勇住直前的,我应该做60%的底池或更大的下注。大盲在转牌上下注$19000是可以的,Dutch的平跟看着也没问题,尽管我更希望看到Dutch加注到$75000。我也不喜欢自己在这儿的平跟,我在这儿平跟主要是为了避免出局,平跟之后,我还剩下$120000。我认为更好的打法是,下注到$80000左右或者直接全押。我很喜欢大盲玩家在河牌上的$33000的下注,他的这个下注额保证了我和Dutch都能玩下去。假设他的下注额更大,那么我和Dutch可能会有一个弃牌或两人都弃牌。

是不走运吗?也许是。但是如果我打对了,如果我采用了更激进的打法,那么这手牌本该是我赢的。假设我在翻牌前再加注,那么可能打走拿JJ的对手,然后赢下底池,让Dutch输给$150000。假设我在5-3-2的翻牌圈下个大注,那么就能在转牌(5-3-2-7)上全押,这时我有八成的把握让JJ的玩家弃牌。可是到头来赛事的结果是我以19名出局(22名钱圏)。但我已经准备好赢几场比赛,我的状态正处于巅峰,准备好也有决心拿下大赛。
324#
yoking 发表于 2011-4-29 14:47:45 | 只看该作者
322 #
West Coast Bust Out
西岸出局

三天韦恩扑克经典冠军赛显然不过瘾,我想打更多扑克赛事。我在韦恩赌场稳稳当当地打了三天牌,结果只以19名出局,22名有钱分;虽然我不满意名次,但好歹进了钱圈。于是当WSOP和ESPN邀请我于第二天飞去圣迭歌的Harrahs-Rincon赌场采访小Dale Earnhardt时,我看了一下WSOP赛程安程,原来主赛事周日拉开战幕,希望我能正好赶上!

比赛进入第二天,我坐在Tim West的左边。Tim West在业内很有人缘,他刚刚在星期四拿下了韦恩经典赛事冠军,而且我很尊敬他在无限德州扑克锦标赛上的打法。打了20分钟后,West在前面位置上加注,我拿83o反加,这手牌之前,West已经加注了很多手牌,感觉到他很弱,我判断正确,West弃了牌。大约30分钟后,West又在前面位置加注而我拿着的是AK。这时的盲注是$300/$600,底注$50,West公开加注到$1600。这时我还没有阅读,于是我反加到$4500,跟着West全押$130000,而我剩下$19000。我看着West,感觉到一股很强劲的力道从他身上散发出来。于是我问自己“Tim是AA吗?”。我感觉他不是AA,那么现在该怎么打?拿AK跟注36BB确实让人为难,但我感觉AK的牌力是够的。West要是拿着KK,那么我的形势会很危险,但是如果West拿的是QQ/JJ/AK,那么跟注还是有保障的。在赛事开始之前,我曾和West聊了好多次电话,我感觉他这手牌打的还是很直接的,也就是说他的牌超级强,我应该弃牌。但我反复地琢磨到底是跟注还是弃牌,最后我认为“West应该没有AA,我要把筹码全部放进底池”。于是我跟注,West亮出KK。桌面是K-10-7-10-J,BYE BYE菲尔!!!

事后West评论这手牌时说:“我觉得最好的打法是ALLIN或平跟你的$2900反加,我不想做任何其他额度的反加,因为我觉得你会弃牌。”对我来说,好的一面是,我猜到West有很大机会是拿KK。下次我再飞去参加扑克比赛时,我必须完全信懒我的直觉。恭喜Tim West取得亚军;韦恩赌场的冠军加上圣迭哥的亚冠,多么让人嫉妒的一周!!!
325#
52magic 发表于 2011-5-1 12:19:17 | 只看该作者
Mr Hellmuth能来这儿和你的中国粉丝聊聊天吗
326#
qeq620 发表于 2011-5-12 11:49:08 | 只看该作者
有钱人。。
327#
Phil Hellmuth 发表于 2011-5-13 04:03:45 | 只看该作者
The Mouth Attempts A Big Bluff

A few months ago I watched the final table of the WPT (World Poker Tour) tournament at the Bay 101 as Mike “The Mouth” Matusow went for the win.  Late in the day, with four players remaining at the table and the blinds at $15,000 - $30,000—and a $5,000 a man ante—Matusow ($1.8 million in chips) opened for $70,000 under the gun with Ac-10d, and Alan Sternberg ($3.7 million in chips) called with 4-4 on the button.  The flop came down Ks-9h-9c, Matusow bet $85,000, and Sternberg called.  The turn card was the 6c, Matusow checked, and Sternberg bet $125,000.  After a minute, Matusow made a move and raised it up to $325,000 to go (a $200,000 raise), and after about 30 seconds Sternberg called.  The river was the 3h, and Matusow bet $500,000, and Sternberg quickly called.

I break this hand down, both here in this column below and in full video on the WPT website.  Before I begin, I need to give some context to the hand.  Matusow had not made a single bluff for hours, and he was clearly the tightest player at the table.  Matusow’s opening raise of $70,000 (a little bit over a 2x raise of $60,000) is the standard sized raise of 2011.  It doesn’t mean that I like it!  I would rather see a bigger sized raise of say, three times the big blind ($90,000).  Sternberg’s call was fine.  Matusow’s $85,000 c-bet (continuation bet - where the player that raises it up before the flop bets on the flop) was OK by me, and is standard.  Matusow’s check on the turn was OK; it looks like A-10 is not the best hand, so why not give up losing $155,000?  Sternberg’s $125,000 bet is interesting.  Obviously Sternberg thought that he had the best hand with his pocket fours.  Thus he thought that Matusow was weak, and because of this fact, I like Sternberg’s $125,000 bet.  Another two points that back up Sternberg’s bet: first, by betting here, he freezes Matusow from making a bigger sized bet on the river if Matusow has a pocket pair higher than Sternberg’s, like J-J; second, he protects his hand from losing by forcing Matusow to fold hands like A-Q.  On the other side of the coin, by betting here Sternberg could put himself into a tough spot, because if Matusow does raise it up, then Sternberg probably has to fold as he can only beat a bluff, and Matusow hadn’t bluffed all day long.  So Sternberg’s bet allows Matusow to make a move, or to charge Sternberg more money if Matusow does have him beat and raises it up.  I like Matusow’s $200,000 raise on the turn, but I would have liked it if he had raised it up more, like say $400,000 or so.

I love Matusow’s $500,000 bluff on the river for four reasons: first, Matusow had a good read (Matusow told me that he thought that Sternberg had a small pocket pair): second, Matusow had not attempted a bluff in five hours of play, so that he had a strong image: third, Matusow bet the right amount, in other words he bet like he had A-K: fourth, Matusow’s $500,000 river bet showed a ton of heart and courage—I mean Matusow fired three barrels (he bluffed three straight streets), and this is a rare feat!  Two facts worked against Matusow: first, the fact that Sternberg had already called $325,000 on the turn made it more likely that he would call a $500,000 bet on the river: second, Sternberg had a lot more chips than Matusow did, so that a $500,000 call wouldn’t put too big a dent in his stack.  Give Sternberg maximum credit here for a great read: Sternberg called a three barrel bluff with a small pair!  To sum up, Matusow’s strong bet was trumped by Sternberg’s strong read.
328#
yoking 发表于 2011-5-13 20:06:57 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 yoking 于 2011-5-13 20:09 编辑

327#
大嘴大偷鸡(诈唬)

数月前,我在Bay 101围观了Mike Matusow(业界人称“大嘴”)冲击WPT冠军的决赛桌赛事。那天晚上,桌上只剩下最后四个玩家,当时的盲注是$15000/$30000,底注是$5000。$180万的Matusow拿着AcTd在UTG上公开加注$70000。坐拥$370万的Alan Sternberg拿着44在庄家上跟注。翻牌是Ks9h9c,Matusow下注$85000,Sternberg跟注。转牌是6c,Matusow过牌,Sternberg下注$125000美元。一分钟后,Matusow反加到$325000,一个$200000的加注,30秒后,Sternberg跟注,河牌3h, Matusow下注$500000,Sternberg秒跟。

我会在这个专栏和WPT网站的录像里仔细分析一下这手牌。但在开始前,有必要说明一下这手牌之前的现场情况。Matusow在几小时的比赛中从没做过一次诈唬,很显然他是牌桌上最紧的玩家。Matusow的$70000的公开加注,虽然比2倍的$60000加注略多一点,但这样的加注额可以说是本年度的标准加注额了。尽管如此,但不代表我喜欢这个加注!我宁愿看到他做一个更大额的加注,比如说加3个大盲,也就是$90000。Sternberg的跟注没有问题。Matusow的$85000的C-BET(持续下注——在翻牌前加注的玩家在翻牌圈上继续下注)在我看来是可以的而且很标准。他在转牌的过牌也可以; AT可能并不是最好的牌,所以何必继续打下去呢?不如只输掉$155000作罢算了。Sternberg的$125000的下注是很有意思的,显然他觉得自己的44是最好的牌,而且他感觉到Matusow很弱,基于这个事实,我很喜欢他的$125000的下注。还有两点也是支持Sternberg的下注的:首先,这个下注阻止了Matusow在河牌上拿着比44更大的对子牌,比如JJ做出一个更大的底池;其次,通过这个下注逼Matusow弃掉AQ这类牌,从而实现对自己的牌的保护。但这个下注也有一个缺点,那就是Sternberg把自己处于很为难的境地,因为Matusow反加的话,Sternberg只有弃牌的份儿,因为他的44只能赢诈唬,而且Matusow可是一直都没怎么诈唬过的。所以说Sternberg的下注给了Matusow动作的机会,要是Matusow真得拿着能赢Sternberg的牌下注,那么Sternberg的损失就会更大。我喜欢Matusow在转牌上的$200000下注,但我觉得下注额更大些,比如$400000左右会更好。

Matusow在河牌的$500000诈唬相当出色,有四个理由让我喜欢这个诈唬:首先,Matusow把对手的牌读得很准(他告诉我,他觉得Sternberg拿的是一副小对子牌);第二,在打了五个小时的比赛中,Matusow还没尝试过一次诈唬,这使他的形像显得非常稳健;第三,Matusow的下注额选得很好,也就是说他的下注很像是拿着AK;第四,Matusow的河牌$500000下注显示出他的胆识和勇气——Matusow连续三次持下注,他可是连续诈唬了三条街啊,这样的勇气是很罕见的!但也有两个事实对Matusow不利:第一,Sternberg已经跟注了转牌的$325000反加,这表明他很有可能会跟注河牌的$500000下注;第二,Sternberg的筹码量要比Matusow多得多,$500000的跟注对他的筹码量打击不算太大。我们绝对值得赞叹Sternberg的读牌能力,他拿着一副小对子连续跟了三次持续下注!总而言之,Sternberg的出色读牌能力战胜了Matusow的有力下注。
329#
zyhyzs 发表于 2013-2-3 12:45:32 | 只看该作者
Phil Hellmuth专栏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|Archiver|智游城论坛

GMT+8, 2024-4-29 19:57 , Processed in 0.044228 second(s), 7 queries , Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部